This implication is completely overlooked by scientists.” The Double Slit Mystery Our brains can produce light gives, is that maybe our consciousness and spirit are not contained within our bodies. More intriguing in a recent post by journalist Kari Robinson in titled “Scientists Discover Biophotons In The Brain That Could Hint Our Consciousness is Directly Linked to Light!” she writes that “one of the most exciting implications the discovery that the Theosophical principle of Universal Mind. Recently a New Scientist article titled “We’ve Seen a Thought: The Secret Seven-Dimensional Life of Your Mind” proposed that “consciousness may itself be a shadow of a higher-dimensional structure” - i.e. This “invisible physical” was critical to understanding The Secret Doctrine and the Occult Sciences it presented. Underlying nature is a universal and intelligent medium, a matrix supporting the visible physical world.
“To rescue from degradation the archaic truths which are the basis of all religions and to uncover, to some extent, the fundamental unity from which they all spring.įinally, to show that the occult side of Nature has never been approached by the Science of modern civilization.” “The aim of this work may be thus stated: to show that Nature is not ‘a fortuitous concurrence of atoms,’ and to assign to man his rightful place in the scheme of the Universe . For her monumental work, The Secret Doctrine, she wrote an introduction which included the following challenging declaration: She continually challenged the scientific materialistic beliefs of her day.
The author of The Case Against Reality: Why Evolution Hid the Truth from Our Eyes, pioneering cognitive scientist Donald D Hoffman, believes that evolution designed our perceptions “to keep us alive.” Our perceptions, he says, are “interfaces constructed by natural selection,” in a word randomly.ĮVER arguing for the existence of an invisible conscious world within the visible physical one, the writer of The Secret Doctrine, H.
“WE assume our senses see reality as it is – but that could be just an evolved illusion,” the Jissue of NewScientist declared. 86)Īlexander Scriabin, a Russian pianist and composer who was deeply influenced by Theosophy, visualized a grand magnum opus which he titled Mysterium.Ĭlick the link here or the link below to listen to Nora Eccles, Harrison Museum of Art as three curators describe the exhibit, Painting Music: Enchanted Modernities, and who give us a personalized tour of the Theosophy promoted powers (click below the photo): There is no nonsense, I say it seriously, and you will find it so if you want to know about the super-physical senses. There sounds which are exceedingly acid, and there are sounds which are exceedingly sweet, and bitter, and all the scale of taste, in fact.” Making reference to this sensory merging (known today as “synesthesia”) she explained: “One would merge into the other. “You can even put cotton in your ears-you will see the sound and every little note and modulation that you could not do otherwise.” Synesthesia If you could only see clairvoyantly a person playing a piano, you would see the sound as plainly as you hear it. Hoffman, believes that evolution designed our perceptions “to keep us alive.” Our perceptions, he says, are “interfaces constructed by natural selection,” in a word randomly.Ībout this sensory synesthetic power Blavatsky wrote: The author of The Case Against Reality: Why Evolution Hid the Truth from Our Eyes, the pioneering cognitive scientist Donald D. But is it valid? Experiments my collaborators and I have performed to test the form of sensory perception that evolution has given us suggest a startling conclusion: it isn’t.”
“This assumption is central to how we think about ourselves and the world. “If I’m sober, and don’t suspect a prank, I’m inclined to believe that when I see a cherry, there is a real cherry whose shape and color match my experience, and which continues to exist when I look away. “What is the relationship between the world out there and my internal experience of it – between objective and subjective reality? “WE assume our senses see reality as it is – but that could be just an evolved illusion,” the Jissue of NewScientist insisted.
0 kommentar(er)
